🧐 Detailed Breakdown of the Empty Tomb Contradictions
🔗 Watch Full Video: Christians Can’t Explain Away Bible Contradictions
📜 1️⃣ Who Went to the Tomb?
• Matthew 28:1 → Mary Magdalene and “the other Mary.”
• Mark 16:1 → Mary Magdalene, Mary (mother of James), and Salome.
• Luke 24:10 → Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary (mother of James), and “other women.”
• John 20:1 → Mary Magdalene alone.
🔎 Inference:
• These aren’t minor omissions—the number of women and their names significantly differ.
• John’s version fundamentally changes the experience by making Mary alone instead of part of a group.
🛑 Apologists’ Response (Spotlighting Defense):
• Each author focused on different people, not listing everyone present.
• If John mentions only Mary, it doesn’t mean others weren’t there.
• Counterpoint:
• The issue isn’t omission—it’s contradiction in numbers.
• John’s account forces a different sequence of events, making harmonization impossible.
👼 2️⃣ How Many Angels Were at the Tomb?
⏳ Conflicting Angelic Encounters
• Matthew 28:2-5 → One angel sitting outside on the stone.
• Mark 16:5 → One young man inside the tomb.
• Luke 24:4 → Two men in dazzling clothes inside the tomb.
• John 20:12 → Two angels sitting inside the tomb.
🔎 Inference:
• Matthew’s angel is outside, but in the other Gospels, the angels appear inside.
• The number of angels changes from one to two, making it unclear whether multiple accounts can be combined.
• Who made the resurrection announcement—one angel or two?
🛑 Apologists’ Response:
• “If there were two, then there was at least one.”
• Counterpoint:
• If only one angel speaks, why do some accounts explicitly say two spoke?
• The location of the angel(s) varies, suggesting different traditions rather than omission.
⏳ 3️⃣ When Did the Women Learn of the Resurrection?
• Matthew & Mark: The women were immediately told upon arrival.
• Luke: The women entered the tomb first, then saw the angels.
• John: Mary Magdalene saw nothing at first, ran to Peter & John, and only later saw angels.
🔎 Inference:
• The sequence of discovery fundamentally changes.
• If Mary saw nothing initially (John), how did she hear the angel’s announcement first (Matthew)?
🛑 Apologists’ Response:
• “John’s account is focusing on Mary’s personal experience.”
• Counterpoint:
• If the angel spoke when they first arrived, then John’s version (where she saw nothing) becomes impossible.
• Matthew & John cannot both be true—either she saw the angel immediately, or she didn’t.
🏃 4️⃣ Who Arrived at the Tomb First?
⏳ Order of Arrival Discrepancy
• Matthew, Mark, Luke: The women arrive first, see the angel(s), and then leave.
• John: Mary Magdalene sees nothing, runs to Peter & John, and they arrive first.
🔎 Inference:
• If Mary already saw the angel (Matthew), then she shouldn’t be confused in John’s account.
• Peter & John are absent in the Synoptics, but central in John’s version.
• This changes the narrative sequence entirely.
🛑 Apologists’ Response:
• “John is filling in details that the others didn’t mention.”
• Counterpoint:
• John doesn’t just add details—he creates a different timeline where the disciples arrive first.
• Either the women learned about Jesus from angels first, or Peter did.
🤐 5️⃣ Did the Women Immediately Tell the Disciples?
⏳ The “Silence vs. Proclamation” Contradiction
• Mark 16:8 (earliest Gospel) → The women fled in fear and told no one.
• Matthew, Luke & John → The women told the disciples immediately.
🔎 Inference:
• If Mark’s “they told no one” is true, then the other Gospels are inaccurate.
• If the women were too afraid to tell anyone, how did the disciples find out?
🛑 Apologists’ Response:
• “They were silent at first but later told people.”
• Counterpoint:
• Mark states “they told no one”, not “they delayed but eventually told.”
• Later additions to Mark were written to fix this contradiction.
🔥 6️⃣ Did Jesus Appear First in Galilee or Jerusalem?
• Matthew 28:16-17 → Jesus first appeared in Galilee.
• Luke 24:33-36 → Jesus first appeared in Jerusalem.
🔎 Inference:
• Two different locations for Jesus’ first post-resurrection appearance.
• If he told them to meet in Galilee, why did he first appear in Jerusalem?
🛑 Apologists’ Response:
• “He could have appeared in both places.”
• Counterpoint:
• The problem isn’t that he appeared in both—it’s that each Gospel presents only one as the first.
🎯 Key Takeaways: Why These Contradictions Matter
✅ The empty tomb narratives cannot be reconciled without ignoring what the text actually says.
✅ Apologists rely on selective omissions (spotlighting), but contradictions involve fundamental differences.
✅ If the Gospels evolved over time, it raises doubts about biblical inerrancy.
✅ If a perfect God inspired the Bible, why allow such major discrepancies?
🔗 Watch Full Video & Analyze for Yourself: Christians Can’t Explain Away Bible Contradictions 📜
