Blistering Truths: How Trump’s War Backfired, Yemen Rose, and the Empire Got Exposed

Israel’s Fallout, US Hypocrisy, and the Poorest Nation’s Bold Defiance

Watch Full Video

Link to Video

Main Writers and Their Stances

Ben Norton

Stance: Critical of US imperialism, pro-Palestinian, sympathetic to Yemen’s Ansarallah

Background: Independent journalist and political analyst, known for anti-imperialist critique, formerly associated with Grayzone

Incremental Thought Process & Conclusion Breakdown

Section: Yemen’s Missile Strikes and Trump’s Greenlight to Israel

Timestamp: 0–60s

Statement 1A: Yemen launches “Palestine 2” ballistic missile into Israel and attacks US navy

Statement 1B: Trump bombs Yemen for 72 hours, greenlights Israeli Gaza invasion

› Leading to Initial Thought 1: Trump, while branding himself a peace president, acts aggressively

› Thought 2: Contradictory rhetoric – promising peace while threatening global expansion

› Thought 3: Escalates war in poorest West Asian country

› Concluded Point: Trump is a hypocrite, not a peacemaker

Objective Rebuttal: Early-phase leadership often faces policy shifts; greenlighting military action may reflect geopolitical pressure

Prejudicial Device: Framing – portraying Trump as contradictory by selecting extreme examples

Philosophical Assumptions: States should align action strictly with political branding; peace rhetoric implies total demilitarization

Section: Genocide Allegations Against Israel

Timestamp: 150–210s

Statement 2A: UN reports classify Israel’s actions as genocide

Statement 2B: South Africa initiates ICJ case; multiple nations join

› Thought 1: Legal systems recognize severity of Israel’s actions

› Thought 2: ICJ validates basis for investigation

› Concluded Point: Israel’s Gaza actions legally qualify as genocide

Objective Rebuttal: ICJ ruling allows investigation, not conviction; geopolitical motives may affect country support

Prejudicial Device: Appeal to authority – relies on UN statements as ultimate moral/ethical authority

Philosophical Assumptions: International courts are unbiased, represent global justice equally

Section: US Hypocrisy and ICC Sanctions

Timestamp: 270–310s

Statement 3A: Trump sanctioned the ICC

Statement 3B: ICC arrested Duterte, but ignores Netanyahu

› Thought 1: ICC selectively applies justice

› Thought 2: Western allies escape accountability

› Concluded Point: ICC is biased and manipulated by imperial powers

Objective Rebuttal: ICC faces legal and diplomatic constraints; realpolitik often supersedes ideal justice

Prejudicial Device: Loaded language – “marketing,” “colonial court” create emotional bias

Philosophical Assumptions: Institutions should operate without influence from powerful nations

Section: The Case of Yemen’s Ansarallah & Resistance

Timestamp: 467–600s

Statement 4A: Ansarallah is not an Iranian proxy but a nationalist movement

Statement 4B: Inspired by Hezbollah, Vietnam, and Chavez

› Thought 1: Indigenous roots dismiss external proxy narrative

› Thought 2: Driven by revolutionary and anti-colonial ideology

› Concluded Point: Ansarallah’s fight is legitimate and independent

Objective Rebuttal: Strategic alliance with Iran may blur proxy lines

Prejudicial Device: Dichotomization – splits the narrative into good resistance vs. evil empire

Philosophical Assumptions: All resistance rooted in local legitimacy is righteous

Section: Yemen’s Humanitarian Intervention Doctrine

Timestamp: 750–820s

Statement 5A: Yemen targets Red Sea ships aiding Israel

Statement 5B: Justified as “Responsibility to Protect”

› Thought 1: Mimics Western justification for military interventions

› Thought 2: Poorest nation doing more for Palestinians than wealthy neighbors

› Concluded Point: Yemen is using humanitarian logic more truthfully than the West

Objective Rebuttal: Military blockades can escalate regional conflict, harming neutral parties

Prejudicial Device: Irony-based framing – using West’s language to critique it

Philosophical Assumptions: Intent determines legitimacy of military action

Section: Gulf Nations Complicity via Investments

Timestamp: 1340–1440s

Statement 6A: Jared Kushner’s fund backed by Gulf states invests in Israeli firms

› Thought 1: Oil-rich monarchies fund Israeli expansion

› Thought 2: Normalization with Israel undermines Palestinian cause

› Concluded Point: Gulf monarchies are complicit in genocide

Objective Rebuttal: Investment doesn’t equal ideological support; strategic economics may motivate decisions

Prejudicial Device: Guilt by association – links Gulf regimes to war via indirect financial paths

Philosophical Assumptions: Any support for Israel is a betrayal of Palestine

Insights Based on Numbers

• 400 Palestinians killed in 24 hours (timestamp): Used to emphasize severity of Israeli actions post-ceasefire

• 900 ceasefire violations (timestamp): Quantifies asymmetry in Israeli-Palestinian engagements

• Millions invested by Gulf regimes in Israeli firms (timestamp): Suggests financial entanglement

• 15 years of Gaza blockade (timestamp): Highlights long-term systemic suppression

These numbers are presented to demonstrate the scale and pattern of violence, complicity, and hypocrisy.

Example Exploratory Questions

1. What evidence supports or challenges the claim that Yemen’s Ansarallah is not an Iranian proxy? (Enter E1 to ask)

2. How do global institutions like the ICC reinforce or resist Western hegemony? (Enter E2 to ask)

3. In what ways does the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine apply or misapply to the Red Sea situation? (Enter E3 to ask)

Commands

• [L] Expand summary

• [A] Write an educational article

• [D] Create conclusion diagram

• [T] Assess my knowledge of the video through a multiple-choice quiz

• [I] Indicate timestamps

Glossary

• Ansarallah (Ansar Allah): A Yemeni political-military group leading resistance in North Yemen

• ICJ (International Court of Justice): UN’s primary judicial body handling state-level legal disputes

• ICC (International Criminal Court): Court that prosecutes individuals for war crimes, genocide

• Hezbollah: Lebanese militant group and political party rooted in Shiite ideology and resistance

• Ceasefire Violations: Actions that breach the agreed terms of a military ceasefire

• Iron Dome: Israeli missile defense system

• Gulf Monarchies: Wealthy Middle Eastern states like Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar

Follow the money …

Here’s a detailed breakdown of how several Muslim-majority countries, especially in the Gulf region, are profiting—directly or indirectly—from the colonization of Palestinian land based on the video content and supporting facts:

1. Sovereign Wealth Fund Investments via Jared Kushner

Timestamp: 1340–1440s

Countries Involved:

• Saudi Arabia

• United Arab Emirates (UAE)

• Qatar

Mechanism:

• These nations invested billions of dollars into Jared Kushner’s investment firm after his tenure as Trump’s advisor.

• Kushner’s firm used these funds to invest in Israeli companies, including those:

• Profiting from illegal settlements in the West Bank

• Involved in military technology used in Gaza

Profit Motive:

• Sovereign wealth funds are designed to maximize returns on oil wealth.

• Israeli tech and defense firms offer high returns, even if they operate in occupied Palestinian territories.

2. Normalization Deals: The Abraham Accords

Timestamp: 1180–1230s

Countries Involved:

• UAE

• Bahrain

• Morocco

• Sudan (tentative)

Mechanism:

• Under US-brokered Abraham Accords, these countries normalized relations with Israel.

• This opened pathways for:

• Joint ventures

• Tourism

• Tech exchange

• Security contracts

Profit Motive:

• Access to Israeli tech, cybersecurity, water infrastructure, and defense systems

• Enhanced trade and tourism, with Dubai–Tel Aviv direct flights

• Boosted US diplomatic favors and arms sales

3. Trade and Diplomatic Support

Timestamp: 1080–1120s

Countries Involved:

• Saudi Arabia

• UAE

• Qatar

• Egypt

Mechanism:

• Despite public condemnation of Israeli actions, behind-the-scenes coordination and support occurs:

• Egypt controls Rafah crossing, restricts Gaza movement

• Gulf states host Israeli businesses and support Israeli policies in global forums

Profit Motive:

• Energy and security partnerships

• Political leverage with the West

• Military and surveillance tech procurement

4. Real Estate & Development in East Jerusalem and West Bank

(Not timestamped in video but supported by investigative journalism)

Countries Allegedly Involved:

• Private investors from UAE and Saudi Arabia

Mechanism:

• Buying or investing in real estate projects in contested or annexed areas

• Participating in construction contracts through international subsidiaries

Profit Motive:

• Access to valuable land and development opportunities

• Returns from luxury housing and religious tourism

5. Normalization in Exchange for Technology & Nuclear Perks

Timestamp: 1240–1270s

Countries Involved:

• Saudi Arabia

Mechanism:

• US offered nuclear tech and security guarantees in exchange for Saudi-Israel normalization

• Tech shared would be strategically used to modernize Saudi infrastructure

Profit Motive:

• Gaining nuclear tech, a modern military, and influence in regional security

If you’d like, I can turn this into a visual diagram, educational article, or expand it further with source references. Would you like that?